Former Turkish diplomats arrested over terrorism charges claim they have been tortured as well as sexually abused with police batons, Ankara Bar Association reported.
According to the report, the ex-diplomats were endured torture such as sexual harassment with batons, threats of rape, reverse handcuffing, harsh beatings, being knocked unconscious, and being forced to completely undress.
Arrest warrants were issued last week for 249 former employees for Foreign Ministry. It has been claimed that some of the detainees were exposed to systematic torture in Ankara Police Headquarters so that “they would sign the petition for making use of effective remorse law and become informants.” Ankara Police, on the other hand, denied the allegations in a press statement and stated that 130 attorneys saw the suspects 545 times.
The exact number of detainees is not known under the file with a confidentiality order on it. It is believed that the number exceeds 100 including those who have been arrested or surrendered since May 20.
According to the information the BBC Turkish has garnered, the detention order of detainees, who have been detained for a week, has been extended until Friday through a court order. Statements started to be taken from the detainees today.
All of the female detainees except one have been released. The claims about torture in detention surfaced on Saturday when the women were released.
HDP lawmaker Gergerlioğlu submitted a written question
HDP Kocaeli lawmaker Ömer Faruk Gergerlioğlu announced the claims of torture in Ankara Police Headquarters the other day from his Twitter account. Then Mr. Gergerlioğlu submitted a written question regarding the issue to be answered by Vice President Fuat Oktay.
Speaking to the BBC Turkish, Gergerlioğlu said most of the detainees had been dismissed through emergency decrees and there were claims that 20 suspects were exposed to brutal torture.
In his press statement, he urged the Interior Ministry and Ministry of Justice to take action about the claims.
“I’m told that they said they’d rape him with a truncheon unless he talked”
Moreover, the attorneys contacted by the BBC Turkish requested that “the names of their clients, who will be detained until Friday,” should not be mentioned in the news story “for their safety.”
An attorney told about the torture inflicted on his client as follows:
“They bring him in for questioning on Saturday night, take him downstairs, and then blindfold him. They strip him naked and handcuff him in the back. They keep him on his knees with his head on the ground. They oil his anus, brush a truncheon around it, and tell him they’ll insert it unless he talks. “
“They tell him that the procedure will continue unless he talks until Friday when detention will be over and they demand they want a statement for effective remorse. When my client gets worse there, they stop torturing. When he gets up at night to go to the toilet, he collapses. He passes out once again in the morning during breakfast. Whereupon they take him to the hospital.”
The attorney says that his client was examined at the hospital but was too afraid to tell the doctor about the torture because he was accompanied by officers.
“When my client said he’d been tortured, I didn’t think about anything like it and asked “Roll up your t-shirt so I’ll see it.” I thought it was beating and I could take a photograph. But when he told these, I got speechless. There isn’t any physical sign or mark because the torture had been performed by a professional team.”
According to the statements from 3 different attorneys who spoke to the BBC Turkish, at least 6 persons were exposed to “the activity or threat of rape with truncheon” and at least 20 persons to torture in a room other than the prison cell.
“They are demanded to be informants through torture.”
Another attorney says that the torture started with the release of female detainees and some of the suspects who were taken to court for an extension of detention “limped” because of the torture inflicted on them.
“I’m told that some were raped with a truncheon, and others were threatened again as the top of a truncheon was oiled and moved around the anal area. After these instances of torture, one said he’d take advantage of effective remorse and sign whatever they wanted. To those he did not take advantage of effective remorse, they said, ‘You have time until Friday. If you don’t talk, we’ll do all kinds of torture on you.’”
ANKARA BAR ASSOCIATION
CENTER FOR ATTORNEY RIGHTS, PENAL INSTITUTION BOARD AND CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS
REPORT REGARDING CLAIMS OF TORTURE IN ANKARA PROVINCIAL POLICE HEADQUARTERS INVESTIGATION DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL CRIMES
Subject: The report regarding the meetings and inspections performed by Ankara Bar Association Center for Attorney Rights, Penal Institutions Board and Center for Human Rights into claims about torture in the Investigation Department of Financial Crimes which appeared on the press and exposed to public on 26 May 2019.
Initially, a message was shared on Kocaeli Lawmaker Ömer Faruk Gergerlioğlu’s account on Twitter, the micro-blogging site, on 26 May 2019 that “there are claims of torture in Ankara Police Headquarters.” In later hours and days, claims of “beating to unconsciousness, harassment and forcing to watch those who were being tortured, the fact that acts of torture that were incompatible with human dignity were inflicted in at least four cases, the acts were performed by persons coming to Ankara Police Headquarters from outside who identified themselves as MIT; a diplomat who was beaten to unconscious was hospitalized; doctors did not write any report regarding the incident; the torture continued and it was openly stated that it would get worse; attempts were made to get statements through torture ” appeared on the media, thus revealed to the public about some 100 people identified to be Foreign Ministry Staff dismissed through emergency decrees who were kept in custody in Investigation Department of Financial Crimes.”
The attorneys who provided legal assistance for the persons in custody submitted complaints to the center and boards of our bar association regarding the claims of ill-treatment and torture.
Besides complaints about torture, complaints have been submitted regarding the fact that the colleagues who went to see their clients under their duty of defense were forced to sign an affidavit in accordance with orders from the prosecutor’s office, but in violation of the provisions of the CMK, that said, “I declare and undertake that I will take the power of attorney regarding my representing the person I will see for the investigation file … and present it to Ankara Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office so that it is included in the investigation file (Attachment-1 Order letter from the prosecutor’s office and the record demanded to be signed).
Our Bar Association’s Center for Attorney Rights, Penal Institutions Board and Center for Human Rights made appointments for the on-site inspection of the claims of ill-treatment and torture and well as the claims that the attorneys were demanded to hand in an affidavit for presenting the power of attorney, which is a violation of CMK provisions, and the appointed colleagues went over to the Ankara Provincial Police Headquarters Investigation Department of Financial Crimes on 27 May 2019 to hold interviews and carry out inspections.
The Trip to Investigation Department of Financial Crimes and the Happenings
- Coercion into taking an affidavit for presenting the power of attorney
The officials from Center for Attorney Rights of our bar association went over to the department first. As a result of the meetings regarding the order from the prosecutor’s office about taking an affidavit from attorneys for presenting the power of attorney, which violates the provisions of the CMK, the practice of taking an affidavit was discontinued by the chiefs in the Investigation Department of Financial Crimes.
- Interviews with the persons whose names were reported for suffering ill-treatment and torture
After the discontinuation of the practice of taking an affidavit as a result of the meetings held by the Center of Attorney Rights of our bar association, a second panel comprising members of Penal Institutions Board, Center for Human Rights, and Center for Attorney Rights who visit the Investigation Department of Financial Crimes held a meeting in a closed room with the six persons whose names had been reported regarding the claims of ill-treatment and torture, and statements were officially recorded and signed in the company of the persons who suffered ill-treatment and torture. (The names of the persons interviewed are kept confidential in this report.)
Established by the written statements and as a result of the interviews, the findings regarding the claims of ill-treatment and torture are as follows:
- All the 6 persons who were interviewed stated that they had been taken to meetings under the pretext of “interviews,” where they were forced to become informants and suffered threats and insults. All the 6 persons who were interviewed stated that they were taken out for an interview more than once, they were put under psychological stress during the interview, and they could identify the persons who carried out the interviews if they saw them.
- 5 of the 6 persons who were interviewed stated that they suffered ill-treatment and torture outside the interviews. 1 person with whom an interview was held stated that he did not personally suffer ill-treatment and torture but heard about the claims of ill-treatment and torture from the persons with whom he shared a cell and from other persons when they were taken together to the Criminal Judgeship of Peace during the time extension procedures. No discrepancy was found between the names of persons whom this person heard to have suffered ill-treatment and torture and the names of the persons who declared that they suffered ill-treatment and torture
- According to the common statements of the 5 persons who stated that they had suffered ill-treatment and torture; these persons were taken out of their cells where they were held in custody (one on Saturday night, another the night between Saturday and Sunday, and the other three Sunday night), they were taken to the section on the ground floor of Ankara Provincial Police Headquarters Investigation Department of Financial Crimes (one person said he was taken without handcuffs, while four said they were handcuffed in the back), they were put in through a door with the sign “No Entrance” on it on the narrow hallway at the entrance of the department, the persons who put them in the dark room left, the persons whose faces they could not identify because of the dark first forced them against the wall, blindfolded them (The uncuffed person stated that he was the first to be handcuffed in this room), then forced them to kneel, made them crawl for a while, hit them on the head with truncheons, threatened that they would be raped unless they talked, and the persons in the dark room brushed truncheons on their bodies.
After these events, 3 said they were stripped completely naked, one said he was stripped waist down, one said his trousers were stripped half down; and then 4 persons, the completely and waist-down naked ones, were handcuffed in the back, put in fetus position, had truncheons brush their anal areas; they were subjected to threats and insults all the while; they were given one to two minutes after which they were told “We now move into the next stage” and a substance which they thought to be oil or lubricant was poured on their anal areas and truncheons were brushed around their anal areas. In addition, 1 person stated that they tried to take his trousers off, which they managed to lower halfway, he forced them back up, and he was tortured by having the truncheon brushed over his body and clothes.
- The 5 persons who said they had been subjected to ill-treatment and torture were asked whether the persons who performed the ill-treatment and torture were one of the persons whose face they saw and voice they heard in the Investigation Department of Financial Crimes and they replied that these were different persons. When asked if they used any expression that might reveal their identity, four of the persons said no such expression was used but one stated that he heard them say, “We came from outside; we’re a professional team.”
- The 5 persons who said they had been subjected to ill-treatment and torture stated that they were accompanied by a police officer during the daily examination of the doctor and they could not tell the doctor about what they experienced because they feared for and were worried about their safety of life.
- 1 person who said he was subjected to ill-treatment and torture stated that before the ill-treatment and torture defined as the second stage one person asked him whether he was married and when he said he was he was told “Look, you won’t be able to sleep with your wife and you’ll wake up at night and cry.”
- 1 person who said he was subjected to ill-treatment and torture stated that he got bruises on his knees due to the crawling (the bruises were seen and photographed by the visiting commission) and declared to the doctor on his first examination the day after the torture, but when the doctor verbally declared that he had written in the report as bruises the female officer who was present during the examination panicked, got hold of her mobile phone, and wrote something to someone, and he was then taken out of the room and he was not shown the completed version of the report and they were later transferred to the Criminal Judgeship of Peace for procedures of extending detention time, and the same doctor wrote in the report that there was no mark of battery or coercion in the examination they were taken after the extension decision, and he had no idea about the fate of the other report.
- 1 person who said he was subjected to ill-treatment and torture stated that he was told before they started ill-treatment and torture that “We rape with truncheons here; you must’ve heard about it. It’s all true,” and then he was subjected to the ill-treatment and torture explained above.
- 1 person who said he was subjected to ill-treatment and torture stated that he did not say anything to his friends when he returned to the cell after the experience; all he could say was that there was torture, and then he went to sleep; when he wanted to go to the toilet when he woke up he passed out; 112 medical team came in, checked his blood pressure and then left; he also passed out in the morning after the events; and he had not slept for 48 hours.
- 1 person who said he was subjected to ill-treatment and torture stated that when they were taken before the Criminal Judgeship of Peace he said to the Criminal Judge of Peace that he had been subjected to ill-treatment; the judge answered, “Is it just you? Why doesn’t anyone else have it;” whereupon another person who stated that he had been subjected to ill-treatment and torture said, “I’ve subjected to torture too.” 2 persons in the same trial stated that the judge said, “I’m not a doctor; this isn’t my job; Go tell it to the doctor.”
When our colleagues who were appointed by the central office and boards of our bar association informed the officials at the Investigation Department of Financial Crimes about the names of the persons with whom they wanted to interview, they were told that statements were taken from 3 of these persons since they wanted to take advantage of the provisions of effective remorse and they were then released. The files of these persons had been reviewed and no finding about ill-treatment or torture had been reported in their files. Similarly, the reports of the persons with whom interviews were conducted and about whom the findings above are confirmed had been reviewed and it was reported that there was no sign of battery or coercion. The persons with whom the interviews that revealed the findings were made named the 3 persons who took advantage of the effective remorse and were released and stated that they heard from others who went to the interviews and from still others whom they met at the Criminal Judgeship of Peace when they were transferred to the courthouse for the time extension order for detention that they were subjected to ill-treatment and torture like they were. As stated in the ECHR as well as other international conventions, the presence of the doctor’s report per se is not a sign that no ill-treatment or torture was experienced. When the accounts that reveal the findings above are evaluated as a whole, (it can be seen that) the persons were illegally taken to doctor’s examination in company of a police officer. The accounts of the persons who were heard do not contradict one another. When the accounts are evaluated as a whole, they confirm the fact that these persons were subjected to torture and ill-treatment in a way that would not leave any mark of battery or coercion.
Article 17/3 of the Constitution, which stipulates a ban on torture, reads as follows:
“No one shall be subjected to torture or mal-treatment; no one shall be subjected to penalties or treatment incompatible with human dignity.”
In addition, Article 3 of the ECHR is as follows:
“No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.”
Moreover, Article 1 of Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment states that
“For the purposes of this Convention, the term “torture” means any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him or a third person information or a confession, punishing him for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, or intimidating or coercing him or a third person, or for any reason based on discrimination of any kind, when such pain or suffering is inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in an official capacity. It does not include pain or suffering arising only from, inherent in or incidental to lawful sanctions.
This article is without prejudice to any international instrument or national legislation which does or may contain provisions of wider application.”
These provisions ban torture and ill-treatment in international and national norms.
Furthermore, Article 4 of Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment is as follows:
“Each State Party shall ensure that all acts of torture are offences under its criminal law. The same shall apply to an attempt to commit torture and to an act by any person which constitutes complicity or participation in torture.
Each State Party shall make these offences punishable by appropriate penalties which take into account their grave nature.”
International norms stipulate that torture should be defined as crime and penal sanctions should be enforced. Turkey is one of the state parties in the abovementioned convention.
Article 94 of the Turkish Penal Code, titled Torture, is as follows:
“(1) A public officer who performs any act towards a person that is incompatible with human dignity, and which causes that person to suffer physically or mentally, or affects the person’s capacity to perceive or his ability to act of his own will or insults them shall be sentenced to a penalty of imprisonment for a term of three to twelve years.
(2) If the offence is committed against:
- a) a child, a person who is physically or mentally incapable of defending himself or a pregnant women; or
- b) a public officer or an advocate on account of the performance of his duty, a penalty of imprisonment for a term of eight to fifteen years shall be imposed.
(3) If the act is conducted in the manner of sexual harassment, the offender shall be sentenced to a penalty of imprisonment for a term of ten to fifteen years,
(4) Any other person who participates in the commission of this offence shall be sentenced in a manner equivalent to the public officer.
(5) If the offence is committed by way of omission there shall be no reduction in the sentence.”
In our Turkish Penal code, the crime of torture entails penal sanctions. In this respect, considering the findings above, an investigation must be launched against the concerned parties and not also the persons who ignore the crime of torture and commit the crime of torture but also anybody else who attacked the physical and mental entity of others must be identified and punished.
Therefore, the law stipulates that
- Considering the fact that the law enforcement officers who carried out the investigation into the detainees could be the suspects of a probable investigation of torture or ill-treatment, they should be suspended from the investigation so that torture and ill-treatment against the detainees can be prevented and the investigation can be carried out effectively;
- Although daily doctor’s examinations must be conducted in accordance with the Istanbul Protocol, to which Turkey is a party, necessary instructions must be submitted for examination procedures to be conducted in accordance with the Istanbul Protocol because law enforcement was kept present during examination in violation of the protocol;
- All the suspects kept in custody in Ankara Provincial Police Headquarters Investigation Department of Financial Crimes must be brought before the prosecutor’s office immediately without getting their statements completed at the police headquarters;
- An investigation must be launched ex-officio for the identification of the persons who committed the crime of torture; an effective investigation must be conducted so that material facts can be revealed and any spoliation of evidence can be forestalled; units and members of Provincial Gendarmerie must be used as per Articles 160/2 and 164 of the CMK no. 5271, and units and members of the police must not be appointed directly in this investigation;
- All the raw camera footages from 20 May 2019 when the detention procedures were started to 28 May 2018 must be collected immediately starting with those of the different places of detention where the suspects were kept at Ankara Provincial Police Headquarters, the camera footages that show the entrances and exits of the Investigation Department of Financial Crimes as well as all the camera footages inside the Investigation Department of Financial Crimes, and the moments when the detained suspects were being taken away for interviews and torture so that the suspect law enforcement officers can be identified; because it is known that camera recordings were previously erased after their preservation for 30 days in similar applications due to claims of law enforcement officers’ battery and torture against both attorneys and suspects, legal obligations must be fulfilled for all pieces of evidence to be collected and protected;
- Considering the fact that the law enforcement officers who carried out the investigation could well be the suspects of a probable investigation of torture or ill-treatment, the staff who were assigned to the said operations must be suspended until the investigation into claims of torture and ill-treatment is completed;
- Considering the fact that a judge who learns about a claim of torture and ill-treatment is obliged to take action and that the Criminal Judge of Peace did not take any action although the persons declared to him that they were subjected to torture, the Criminal Judge of Peace who issued an extension on detention period must be identified and necessary legal action must be taken against him.
In this respect, we bring to the public attention the fact that we are ready to present Ankara Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office with the records and documents drawn up by the members of our bar association in the boards and central office in case or when they are demanded and we as Ankara Bar Association will continue the legal struggle to the very end so that torture and ill-treatment can be eliminated.
Turkish businessman suffers skewer attack in prison
Stabbed seven times with a skewer in Menemen Prison, Hazim Sesli is known for his proximity to Abdullah Gul and Ali Babacan, who established a new political party recently. What he said during his latest hearing was quite striking.
Mr. Hazım Sesli has been detained since October 22, 2015. The Erdogan Regime started arrests against the Gülen Movement in 2014 and turned its resentment towards the business people in 2015. While the billion-dollar companies like Koza and Boydak were targeted, the blanket factory owner Mr. Hazım Sesli was also one of the targets.
In this context, after Mr. Sesli was arrested and trustees were appointed to his factories in 2015, all of his assets were confiscated during the state of emergency in 2016. Hazım Sesli was a business person close to the politicians. He was especially known for his relations to the former President Abdullah Gül.
Record for gruesome assault
Mr. Hazım Sesli was subjected to a rather suspicious attack in Menemen Prison, where he was detained. The attacker named Fatih Oktay is a murderer prisoner who has previously flayed his wardmate’s scalp in prison.
Mr. Sesli was taken out of the cell where he was kept and taken with the guards for a weekly family phone call, and the attacker assaulted while on the phone. Fatih Oktay attacked Mr. Hazım Sesli with a piercing tool called skewer. First, the attacker targeted his heart but failed because the skewer hit the phone. Thereafter scuffle started and Mr. Hazım was injured in 7 places on his body. He was taken to the infirmary then to the hospital and subsequently brought back to his cell on the same day.
Fifteen years prison sentence
Mr. Sesli has been sentenced to 15 years in prison. At the hearing at the Uşak 2nd High Criminal Court on September 17, 2019, he said, “There is a lot I know about current ministers and former ministers. I have not spoken until now, but if I speak, some politicians will be brought to the brink of chaos.”
Mr. Hazım Sesli said the following at the hearing in the court on September 17, 2019:
“I repeat my previous statements. The reports issued by The Savings Deposit Insurance Fund of Turkey on my companies, which are administrated by the trustees now, are unilateral, unlawful, and these companies are managed unlawfully. My companies have been usurped. My companies aided many associations, companies, and foundations run by the government and the ruling AK Party. I have been in prison and a cell for 4 years. Despite all the petitions I have written, no information is given on why the prison authorities treat me antagonistically. Sesli family is discriminated against in every possible way, and it is unjust. We will call out for the mistreatment made later in the eye of law. We will bring these people to account in the same way as the coup plotters of September 12, 1980, and February 28, 1997, were brought to account. There is a lot I know about the current ministers and former ministers. I have not spoken until now, but if I speak, some politicians will be brought to the brink of chaos. I demand that this be known.”
Fatih Oktay, who attacked Mr. Hazım Sesli, said in his first statement that “Mr. Hazım Sesli is a traitor. For this reason, I wanted to kill him. I have carried out this attack because of his words insulting the nation”. However, Hazım Sesli has been in the cell and under isolation for 3.5 years. There is no possibility to speak with the attacker. It is also worth remembering here that Mr. Sesli received refusals from his petitions he gave to lifting the heavy isolation, chatting with other prisoners, and fulfilling his sports rights.
After meeting with his lawyers and relatives after the attack, Mr. Hazım Sesli stated that he considers the incident as a planned one, and it is an order that comes straight from the higher authority.
Taking this into consideration, it is necessary to focus on the attacker Fatih Oktay’s profile and the attack moment.
Earlier in Turkey, there were murders in prisons where the state’s “contribution” was somehow involved, when inspected, and the most featured one was Mustafa Duyar assassination.
Nuri Ergin, who killed Mr. Duyar in his cell, said, “This state instructed me to kill Mustafa Duyar. Learn about me more from Veli Küçük”.
It is a significant point how Fatih Oktay was able to take a piercing tool called “skewer” into a high-security-level prison. According to the allegations of the prison administration, he made the tool himself. However, there is another evident point.
The guards carry out body searches for the detainees or prisoners while they take out them from the cell for their phone-call time. It is another remarkable point that Fatih Oktay was taken out from his cell with his skewer for the phone call at the same time with Mr. Hazım Sesli and that the guards who had to be in the corridor at that moment did not intervene during the 7-times swelling of Sesli.
It was also interesting how Oda TV reported after the incident. The news, titled “They swelled the FETO imam (leader) in prison,” contained sentences to encourage similar attacks.
Another figure that was attacked in prison in the past days was Ömer Köse, former Istanbul Deputy Counter Terrorism Director. Köse was attacked by six guards in the cell where he was kept in Tekirdağ Prison. Köse, just like Sesli, was threatened before the attack, and he reported this situation to the prison administration with a petition saying, “my life safety is at stake.”
Top-scorer law student’s life devastated
One of the 80 undergraduate students detained in the raid in Ankara is the top-scorer in the Secondary School Placement Examination. His father died in prison, and his mother was a victim of the crackdown on religious people during the military tutelage in 1997.
Eighty undergraduate students were detained in a raid against the Gulen movement on February 28. After 12 days of detention, authorities arrested some while releasing others.
One of the arrested students is Muhammet Miraç Özer, who is the final year student of Ankara University, Faculty of Law. Enrolling at the university with the 900th place among 2.255.386 who took the University Placement Examination test, Muhammet Miraç Özer was also the top-scorer among 1.112.604 participants who took the Secondary School Placement Examination test.
Miraç Özer’s father was a 48-year-old doctor who passed away in prison during the state of emergency. Her mother was a victim of the crackdown during the February 28 post-modern coup. The Erdogan regime has always stated they were victims of that crackdown. February 28 is the historic moment when the women wearing the headscarf who wanted to study at the universities were persecuted, and the beginning of the mistreatment against the people who practice religion started.
Mrs. Asuman Özer, whose son was taken into custody on February 28, 2020, after 23 years of February 28, 1997, underwent a somewhat similar trauma.
No valid grounds for arrest
“My husband, Ali Özer, was arrested during the state of emergency. He died in prison two and a half months later. My son, who was recently arrested, suffered great psychological distress. He was then a second-year student at Ankara University, Department of Law. He had to drop for a year due to the trauma. He hardly recuperated. They arrested him for no tangible reason.”
Stating that two of her children continue with their education in Canada and Europe, Mrs. Asuman stressed that her eldest son Miraç stayed in Turkey to complete his studies in the Faculty of Law.
“Our house was in a remote district in Ankara. It was a 1.5 hours distance from my son’s school by car. He rented a house near the university along with a friend. Then he lived alone for a while after disagreements with his flat-mate. After a while, we had trouble meeting the costs, and he started to live with other friends of his. It was a house he had rented. It was certainly not a Gulen movement house, as claimed.”
“Miraç was in the second grade when his father passed away in prison. He literally had a psychological breakdown. I almost lost my child. He dropped out of school. A year later, he recuperated and continued to his education again. It took a long time to put our life and affairs in order again. He focused on his studies again.
He was the top-scorer in the Middle Schools Placement Examination in Turkey in his first year. He had only one incorrect answer out of 100 questions in his 2nd and 3rd years. As a very successful student, he also was the 900th student in the University Placement Examination. His success took him to the Faculty of Law. He really was a very successful boy. They ruined my son.
The Ankara Bar Association has drawn public attention to the torture of 80 students detained in the Ankara Police Department. The minutes published by the Ankara Bar read that the female students were being stripped to their underwear and beaten down, and police have forcibly removed their headscarves. Mrs. Asuman Özer was very worried about her son.
“They tortured the girls; I cannot imagine what they will do to the boys. I do not even want to imagine. They detained my son for 12 days and then arrested him with no tangible piece of evidence. If my son had any problems, he would carry on with his education abroad with us. He is a child who has no intention other than graduating from university.”
Saying that she still could not get over the pain of losing her husband, Mrs. Asuman Özer cannot keep her tears for her son’s arrest.
“They took away my husband, and now they took my son. What more do they want from us? Everyone in my family is in different countries. Miraç recovered very hard after his father’s loss. I almost lost my son right after his father’s death. He is just an ordinary person. What do they want from us? It is enough.”
Suffered during military tutelage
Mrs. Asuman Özer says that she has been the victim since February 28, 1997, and it is no different today.
Mrs. Asuman Özer stated that she had been the victim of her since February 28 and said, “I was a primary school teacher employed by the Ministry of Education. Three years into my career, the headscarf issue arose during the February 28 process. Since I was wearing a headscarf, an investigation was launched against me and I had to resign. I couldn’t do my job for 16 years. Then, when the headscarf ban was abolished, I returned to my profession. Three years later, this time, I was expelled with a Decree-Law in the state of emergency.”
Husband passed away
Working at Nallıhan State Hospital as a Chief Physician, Mrs. Asuman Özer’s late spouse Ali Özer started working as a primary care physician in Sincan, Ankara. He was detained during the state of emergency.
“On January 9, 2017, my husband was arrested. He passed away on March 22 after two and a half months in prison. He didn’t have any health issues before he was arrested. Authorities declared [the cause of death] as a heart attack, but the medical reports mention internal bleeding. We presented this report to the doctors and then filed a criminal complaint, but no effective investigation was conducted. I cannot claim anything, but my husband’s death was not investigated.”
Mrs. Asuman Özer wants her child to be released as soon as possible so that his education will not be interrupted for the second time, saying that her child is not involved in any crime.
Imprisoned police chief beaten by guards
Entering the prison cell where former police chief Ömer Köse was kept alone, five or six guards assaulted him. Details of Köse’s health condition and attack are in the news piece.
BOLD – Istanbul Police Department’s former Anti-Terror Branch manager Ömer Köse has been in prison since August 2014. Mr. Köse, who was kept alone in Tekirdağ No 2 F-Type Prison with Penalty, was reportedly attacked on March 4 by the guards in his cell.
Ömer Köse was reportedly threatened by a guard after a phone call last Monday and that Mr. Köse reported this situation in writing to the prison administration.
Ignoring Mr. Köse’s written petition, the battering took place during the count on Wednesday evening. Köse’s account of the incident is as follows:
“Since I am kept in a single cell, a guard normally comes to the counts and finishes in a few seconds. However, 5-6 guards entered the cell on Wednesday. One of the guards suddenly started hitting my abdominal area and back. When I reacted to defend myself, my arms were held by other guards, and the guard who hit me first started punching me.”
The same guard previously quarreled with Mr. Ömer Köse reportedly and made efforts to prevent him from exercising his legal rights in prison consistently.
Prison psychologist ignored
Mr. Köse reportedly pressed the panic button after being assaulted, but the prison psychologist came along with the guard who attacked him. Mr. Köse reported the threats and explained to the psychologist how he was beaten in full detail, also submitting a petition to the prison administration. However, no action was taken.
Mr. Köse is reportedly in good condition currently.
The right violations against Ömer Köse in Tekirdağ Prison have been on the public agenda before.
It was mentioned that the isolation applied to Mr. Köse is quite unbearable. While all prisoners meet with their families in the same hall, the prison authorities allowed Mr. Köse for individual non-contact and contact visits with his family members in a special room. Thus, it is ensured that he does not see anyone other than the guards who come to his cell. The right to chitchat and sports are not allowed exclusively for Mr. Ömer Köse at Tekirdağ No 2 F Type Prison.
The most crucial problem faced by Mr. Köse is that his petitions are not processed. The guards intentionally ignore criminal complaints made by Mr. Köse to the prosecutor’s office about the practices of the prison administration.
On December 17, 2013, after the graft probe targeting Tayyip Erdogan’s son Bilal Erdogan and four ministers, Erdogan dismissed and arrested a large number of police officers, prosecutors, and judges. Erdogan labeled the probe as a judicial coup against his administration. Mr. Ömer Köse was one of the police chiefs arrested during this period.